Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Personal: I wish I could say...

But on Saturday, December 4, 2010
(And the time was exactly 07:48AM, as the Short Text Message in my moblile phone shows)
Love run away from me.
It left a message, this love; sad, sad message:

"I cherished the moments we had,
And everything we shared.
However, I write to inform you that, with effect from today (I have said it was December 4, 2010; 07:48AM),
There is nothing special between us.
Find a place in your heart to forgive me".

I was a mender-of-soles' place
That hour of morning.
Happy, up beat,
Preparing for the day that entered the ring with a fullsome sun,
Shining
Reflecting on pieces of glass on the ground,
Moving gradually through the blueless sky.

"Hey, read the text message before I do", I told the mendr-of-soles
-Only that he was mending a white belt, this time.
The handler-of-worn shoes read the message,
And was fooled by the word cherish,
And said the tidings were good,
Timely for a day with a shining sun.
"I swear it's good news; it is love in a mobile phone's inbox," he said, eating mangoes, after touching the soul of a bent shoe, whose to and fros he knew not.

Somethings we eat,
The way we eat:
Life is a question.

So, happily
I read the message,
And was never fooled by the word 'cherish'.
200 calls went unanswered,
When in the past the other side was a robbot:
Grabbing,
Wrestling,
Rushing
-At the whim of a mouthless gadget.
No more.

Thus started the blues,
Saturday,
Sunday,
Monday
-Bad days for sure.
Tuesday was better,
As it was the chooosing day:
Happy of gloom?

And the tabernacle-of-clay that carried the love is gone.
And went with a big lie,
Revealed during the 201st call attempt:
"Hullo," said the other side.
(What was supposed to be a love)
"I mean exactly as I have put it".
"So, you mean to say we have bee living a lie:
I have been living a lie,
This long?"
"Yap".
"Thanks, good luck"
"Yap".

Yap,
Life ends in yap.

Then, came the call from the other side
The side was love no more:
"Hello..."
Nothing like the 'Hullo" before.
"Yap," I said, taking it from Saturday morning.
"I wish to say..."
"No. Don't you know I was hurt?
And that I have realised,
That all the hurt and unbelief,
And pain,
And anger..
Was because.., I mean
Was not because of you?
I thought I was heart-broken for losing you,
But, but now I know,
It wasn't you,
At all, at all.
It was me,
Paying tribute to my love,
Knowing I can love and be loved,
And be dumped and grabbed.
Yes, the hurt and the pain..
I was paying tribute to my love.
Only that, my tribute tended to attach a face to this,
My love,
And the face was that of you.
No, I wasn't crying for you,
It is my love I was paying tribute to.
Go, go away."

"But..."
"Go, go away.
I couldn't sleep past three days since Saturday,
And it was because of you.
My left arm could grab dead wood and feel nothing.
I though it was a heart attack,
Attacking because of you".

"But.."

"Go, go away.
I am busy patching up my heart,
Before I give it away again".

Silence.
The love is gone. 


Vonetta's prayer

May God remember you like Noah, favour you like Moses, honour you like Mary, fight for you like the Israelites, prosper you like Isaac, promote you like Joseph, intervene for you like Esther, protect you like Daniel, use you like Paul, heal you like Naaman, answer you like Elijah, anoint you like David, and keep you safe like Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego. This is my prayer for you, Send this to persons you love and are praying for. I just did. Have a blessed day


Surely, He loves us all

And cares,

endlessly.

On 16 Days of Gender Activism

A lot has been said.
The Chipembere Highway walked.
In the end,
The 16 Days of Gender Activism are aimed at maintaining the dignity of the Malawian woman.
Chimwemwe Tembo, a Blantyre-based lady, says Malawians should start treating the woman as a noble being, capable of creating unlimited possiblities.

Chimwemwe Tembo, Blantyre: Respect the Malawian woman
"The Malawian woman is not an object of malice, but should be respected," she says.
When she is respected, the Malawian woman will look like her: no bruises from gender and domestic violence.

MRA introduces discreet taxes

The Malawi Revenue Authority (MRA), Government's revenue collection arm, has discreetly introduced new charges, adding on to the 20 per cent government imposed on second hand vehicles to prevent the country from turning into a dumping ground.
The new charges are being implemented without Parliament's approval.
Whereas impoters used to contribute about 300,000 in taxes over a K1.8 million vehicle, they now have to pay an extra K80, 000 in unknown charges, raising shelf prices in the process.
One of the second-hand vehicle dealers, Yusuf Ulaya, said car dealers are being delt heavy blows everywhere they go, including in Mozambique and Zimbabwe.

Second-hand car dealing: Getting expensive for Malawian traders
In Mozambique, Malawian car importers are paying a refundable 1,000 in that country's currency. However, it takes over three months for Mozambican customs officials to repay the money. Traders say this is eating through their operations costs.
In Zimbabwe, however, the case is different. Second-hand vehicles are no longer using the country as a point of transit from South Africa, a development that has spiralled transport costs for Malawian traders.
"The situation is so bad and it is our prayer that President Bingu wa Mutharika, who serves as the African Union Chairperson, will intervene and serve us from economic collapse," said Ulaya.
He plies his trade in Blantyre City Business District.

Sidik Mia: Loved in the Lower Shire

Go to the Lower Shire aaand ask about Sidik Mia.
Almost each and everyone will have something to say about him; all of which good.
Mia has tried his best to uplift the lives of people in this part of Southern Malawi.
In so doing, he has distributed food items, brankets, clothes and provided shelter for the needy.
He as an example of a good man turned politician, and politics made good.
No wonder, he has served in both Dr. Baliki Muluzi's and Ngwazi Professor Bingu wa Mutharika's administration.
His success trascends politics. Through his S&A Cold Storage (co-owned by Sidik and inspirational wife Abida), Malawi continues to get quality beef supplies.
All these show that Malawi has vast opportunities; opportunities made good by good people. Sidik Mia being one.

China, Iran propel journalist imprisonments to highest level in 14 years

  • in Sub-Saharan Africa, four out of five held incommunicado without charge or trial


  •   Eritrea, Africa’s largest prison for journalists & world’s third jailer


 

 

 New York, December 8, 2010—China’s brutal suppression of ethnic journalism and Iran’s sustained crackdown on critical voices have pushed the number of journalists imprisoned worldwide to its highest level since 1996, the Committee to Protect Journalists said in a new report. In its 2010 census of imprisoned journalists, CPJ identified 145 reporters, editors, and photojournalists behind bars on December 1, an increase of nine from the 2009 tally.







With at least 17 journalists who have disappeared in governnment custody and are being held without charge or trial for months and years, Eritrea was the world’s third foremost jailer of journalists, CPJ research shows. Secret detention centers in the reclusive Red Sea nation held the most journalists in Africa, an unbroken record for Eritrea since 2001 following the government’s brutal shutdown of the private press and the arrests of 10 editors. With four journalists behind bars, neighboring Ethiopia lagged behind as it has since 2005, despite similar crackdowns. In 2010 CPJ recognized the work of Dawit Kebede, an Ethiopian journalist who was released from prison and remains at the helm of the country's leading independent weekly.







As of December 1, at least 23 journalists were detained in prisons in Sub-Saharan Africa in connection with their work. From these, four out of five have been held incommunicado in secret detention centers without charge or trial for several years.







With 34 imprisoned journalists apiece, China and Iran are responsible for nearly half of the worldwide total. Eritrea with 17, Burma with 13, and Uzbekistan with six, round out the five worst jailers from among the 28 nations that imprison journalists. At least 64 freelance journalists were behind bars worldwide, a figure consistent with the 2009 census.







Detailed accounts of each imprisoned journalist are available here.







“Eritrea, Ethiopia and The Gambia are leaders among the few African nations accustomed to detaining members of the press incommunicado without charge or trial,” said Mohamed Keita, CPJ Africa advocacy coordinator. “Without formal charges to fight or a trial in sight, prospects are grim for these journalists to gain freedom and for others to defy the chilling effect such imprisonments have.”







Globally, journalists are most commonly held on antistate charges (72 cases) or even no charge at all (34 cases). Both China and Iran rely heavily on the use of vague antistate charges. But CPJ found that the abusive application of antistate charges—such as treason, subversion, or acting against national interests—occurs worldwide and constitutes the single greatest cause of journalist imprisonments.







CPJ's annual census is a snapshot of those incarcerated at midnight on December 1, 2010. It does not include the many journalists imprisoned and released throughout the year; accounts of those cases can be found at www.cpj.org. Journalists who either disappear or are abducted by nonstate entities such as criminal gangs or militant groups are not included on the prison census. Their cases are classified as “missing” or “abducted.”



###



CPJ is a New York-based, independent, nonprofit organization that works to safeguard press freedom worldwide











Note to editors:



1 An analysis of CPJ’s 2010 imprisoned census is available here: http://cpj.org/reports/2010/12/cpj-journalist-prison-census-iran-china-highest-14-years.php



2 Documentation on each case is available here: http://cpj.org/imprisoned/2010.php



3 A video report featuring J.S. Tissainayagam, a Sri Lankan columnist freed from an unjust imprisonment, is available here: http://cpj.org/reports/2010/12/video-report-shining-light-on-a-dark-prison-cell.php







Over the past year, CPJ advocacy led to the early release of Tissainayagam and at least 45 other imprisoned journalists.





 

 

 

 
Case 5: Jews


One of the biggest examples of ethical dualism in Islam is the Jews. The Meccan Koran is filled with stories about Moses, Noah, Adam, and other Jewish figures. The early Koran is very Jewish. The perception of the Jews completely changes in Medina. Every verse, story, and hadith is negative and anti-Jew. The Trilogy devotes a great deal of material to the Jews .





The Trilogy of Medina is even more negative about the Jews than Hitler's Mein Kampf. What marks the biggest difference between Mein Kampf and the Trilogy is that Hitler did not write a first section in Mein Kampf detailing how much he admired the Jews. There is a contradiction about how the Koran treats Jews in Mecca and how they are treated in Medina. Due to dualistic reasoning, both attitudes about the Jews are true, at the same time.



Case 6: The Good in the Koran

In the face of these negative statistics, everyone knows of good verses in the Koran. Exactly how much material in the Koran is positive for Kafirs? There are 245 verses, 4,018 words, in the Koran that say something positive about Kafirs. This is about 2.6% of the total Koranic text . However, in every case, the verse is followed by another verse that contradicts the "good" verses. Also, except for 7 verses (58 words), the "good" verse is abrogated later in the same chapter. The other 7 verses are contradicted in later Suras.



The media emphasizes Islam's positive verses about the People of the Book, the Jews and Christians. Even this turns out to be illusive. Christians and Jews receive the goodness of Islam only if they agree that their sacred texts are corrupt, the Koran is true, and that Mohammed is a prophet of the Christian and Jewish religion.



In the end there is no unmitigated good for Kafirs in the Koran. What good can be found in the 2.6% of the text is denied later.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Seodi White talking Gender-based violence now

Women and Law in Southern Africa (WILSA) Executive Director, Seodi White, is talking about 16 Days of Activism on Malawi Broadcasting Corporation Television.
White is bashing assumptions that men suffer more from Gender-based Violence than women, only that women have more mouth pieces.
"That is not true; actually, we look at where women have come from, and you will see that they have come from a very difficult background than men. That is what we want to correct," says White.
She adds that women's problems have been compounded by assumptions and that women have to be "shie" all the time, which has exposed them to various forms of violence.

Plot to decampaign Rev. MacDonald Kadawati exposed

Rev. MacDonald Kadawati: Unshaken by latest plot

A group of 15 members from Blantyre Church of Central Africa Presbyterian (CCAP) has emerged, the aim of which is to discredit Rev. MacDonald Kadawati over the treatment accorded to Rev. Raynold Mangisa after a press briefing at which he attacked the Episcopal Conference of Malawi over the manner it handled its Pastoral Letter.


Insiders say the group has received K2 million from Presidential Adviser on Religious Affairs, Rev. Billy Gama. However, Peter Zaile Kalilombe, one of the self-confessed members of the group, denied the allegations, saying the group only wanted to “clear the air” by forcing the resignation of both the Synod’s General Secretary, Kadawati, Mangisa (as the moderator) and “all those involved in this issue”.

“Actually, we feel that we will uphold the integrity of the Blantyre CCAP Synod if all these people go. We feel like all those involved have let us, church members, down. There should have been a better way of handling the issue,” said Kalilombe.

Kalilombe said developments in the Synod were giving government and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party a lee-way to play “divide-and-rule” in the CCAP Church, a development that would pile on the confusion that already exists between Livingstonia and Nkhoma Synod- two Synods that have been at the centre of a land dispute for decades.

The genesis of the struggle between Nkhoma and Livingstonia lies in the word ‘comity’, introduced by colonizers to prevent religious disputes in 1900. Implementation of the Comity agreements resulted into specific areas in Malawi being distinguished by one particular denomination.

For instance, Dedza district was left as the domain of the Catholic Church, to the effect that all villagers in the area of Traditional Authority Kamenyagwaza and Kaphuka were all Catholic before 1980; Blantyre was for CCAP; So were districts such as Nkhatabay.

However, the 1980s marked the beginning of religious plurality as such denominations as Living Waters Church became established (in 1981) after disagreements in mother Churches.

All this led to the decline in traditional religion.

Commenting on the recent development (formulation of the ‘rebel’ group), Kadawati professed ignorance while Mangisa said he had no comment to make since issues related to the issue were in court.

Mangisa obtained a Court injunction last week, stopping Blantyre CCAP Synod from going ahead with its decision to dethrone him from his Moderator post.

Rev. Gama, on the other had, said people were free to comment.

It is clear, however, that the Blantyre CCAP Synod, more than President Bingu wa Mutharika’s government, has become the biggest victim of the Catholic Pastoral Letter.

Meanwhile, government continues to shun Catholic functions.

But Information and Civic Education Minister, Symon Vuwa Kaunda, has quashed suggestions government was in bad blood with the Catholic Church in Malawi, saying the relationship between the two parties has always been “cordial”.

“These allegations are a figment of the imagination of people of ill-will. The church remains government’s partner in development,” said Vuwa-Kaunda.

What to think about on Human Rights Day

Zachimalawi joins hands with Amnesty International to suggest that you consider the following issues on Human Rights Day, which falls on December 10 every year:

Father Solalinde arrested by municipal police in the town of Ciudad Ixtepec, Oaxaca state, Mexico 10 January 2007. He was then briefly detained with 18 Guatemalan migrants.

A 38-year old labour activist, Su Su Nway, is serving a sentence of eight and a half years in a remote prison in Myanmar because she put up an anti-government banner in Yangon.




In Mexico, Father Alejandro Solalinde Guerra, is being intimidated by gangs and officials for providing a safe refuge to migrants who are exploited by criminals.



A woman in Senegal, Khady Bassène, is still waiting for justice and to find out what happened to her husband who disappeared in 1999.



These are ordinary people involved in extraordinary struggles and we don’t want to forget them.



Write for Rights



That’s why we participate in Write for Rights. Every year around International Human Rights Day on 10 December, thousands of Amnesty International members and supporters get together. We write letters and sign petitions taking action for individuals facing the risk of human rights violations.



Father Solalinde arrested by municipal police in the town of Ciudad Ixtepec, Oaxaca state, Mexico 10 January 2007. He was then briefly detained with 18 Guatemalan migrants.





Letter-writing works



Igor Sutyagin, who was in prison in Russia for more than 10 years says letter-writing really works. He said,“The officials, they know about these letters. They know that this person is somehow untouchable and I really want to ask you and all Amnesty members to continue that activity because that will help others. I think it’s very, very important.”



Demand that the rights of Su Su Nway, Father Alejandro, Khady Bassene and others are respected.







You can also participate in a letter-writing event. Enthusiastic volunteers have organised events even in countries where we don’t have an office. Click here and browse through the month of December to find out if there is an event happening near you.



Join in and make this the largest global event of 2010.

Recent Developments in Malawi

1. Parliament on Monday approved Government's Bill to borrow US$750 million from the African Development Bank to be repayed within a period of 15 years at 0.7 per cent. The funds are meant for the establishment of Rural Growth Centres.

Finance Minister Ken Kandodo said the money would be used for the indended purpose.

2. Malawi's urbanization rate is at 5.7 per cent, one of the fastest in Africa and the world. 

3. Parliamentarians have been gagged from accessing online publication, Nyasa Times, within National Assembly premises. Clerk of Parliament, Maltilda Katopola told Zachimalawi the decision is meant to improve Members of Parliament's focus on important national issues.

"That publication is divisive, lies and infringes on people's freedom," she said.
The decision was effected on Novemebr 22, 2010 with the aim of 'safeguarding national interests, including upholding the country's moral values and respect to the instituiton of theState and individual freedoms".

Monday, December 6, 2010

Election in dispute, Ivory Coast bans France-based news broadcasts

Ivorian authorities should immediately lift a ban imposed Thursday on France-based news broadcasters covering the contested presidential election, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today.








The National Council of Audiovisual Communication (CNCA) ordered the local affiliate of France-based satellite television operator Canal+ to suspend all international news channels offered on subscription-based packages, according to news reports and local journalists. Canal+ Cote d’Ivoire, the local affiliate, complied with the ban, which affected about 10 French-language channels, an employee, Clauvis Zahui, told CPJ.







The decision was disclosed Thursday in a statement read during the evening news program on government-controlled RTI.







The announcement came a few hours after France 24, Africa 24, and other stations broadcast a press conference announcing the official results of Sunday’s contested runoff between incumbent Laurent Gbagbo and challenger Alassane Ouattara. The results, in which Outtara was declared the winner with 54 percent of the vote, were immediately declared invalid by the Constitutional Court. The court, which certifies the vote, said the results were announced after a legal deadline had passed. The court declared Gbagbo the winner.







“The ban on popular France-based news broadcasters, which have played an important role in covering the election, deprives Ivorians of diverse sources of reliable news,” said CPJ Africa Advocacy Coordinator Mohamed Keita. “We call on the CNCA to lift this ban immediately.”







The national, publicly funded broadcaster RTI aired news and views favorable to the president, according to local journalists, despite January demonstrations by opposition supporters protesting such coverage. The ban did not affect other stations beaming into Ivory Coast from the region such as Dakar-based West Africa Democracy Radio or Gabon-based Radio Africa Numero1, they said.







Earlier this year, Ivorian authorities suspended the satellite broadcasts of France 24 after it reported on security forces’ deadly suppression of opposition demonstrations.

Media advisory:European Development Days on 6 and 7 December in Brussels

On 6 and 7 December, the European Commission organises the 5th edition of the European Development Days (EDDs) in Brussels, in cooperation with the Belgian Presidency of the European Union. President José Manuel Barroso will deliver a keynote speech at the opening of this major political discussion forum, which brings together current and former Heads of State and Government from Europe, Africa and rest of the world; high-level representatives of governments and international organisations; as well as development practitioners, NGOs, the media and civil society. Organised a few days after the Africa-EU Summit in Tripoli, and in parallel with the United Nations' Climate Change Conference in Cancún, the European Development Days provide a timely and focused interface for stakeholders and governments to address global challenges in an open atmosphere.




On the following website you will find the list of confirmed VIPs and the full programme, http://www.eudevdays.eu/useful_documents_en.cfm.



For journalists following the event online, the following media services will be available from the following website, http://eudevdays.eu/media_corner_en.cfm:



Web streaming (at the end of Day 1 and Day 2 replays will be available of all sessions taking place in the four main halls);

Quotes services (professional journalists will cover the High-Level Panel sessions and edit a selection of VIP quotes. Quotes will be available online 90 minutes after each session in the Media Corner/Quotes on the website);

Photos (six professional photographers will cover the main EDD events as well as bilateral meetings and interviews/debates on the TV and Radio sets. Edited photos will be uploaded to the website 90 minutes after the end of each event in high resolution, jpeg format on the Media corner/Photo coverage;

Daily audiovisual summaries (each day a four-minute, broadcast-ready audiovisual summary will be broadcast via Europe by Satellite, http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/ebs/schedule.cfm.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Kinnah Phiri's 'tactician' credentials on the line

When has scratching one's head become a tactic?


Or, put in other words, since when did pointing one's index finger heavenwards start bringing goals?

And, yet, that was the spectacle in Tanzania Thursday, when Malawi's tactless Flames took on Ugandan Cranes.

It was a match Uganda dominated; but in which Malawi won the hearts of many with their accurate passes, breaking the defense of Uganda at will- no goals. Just a single out-of-the-blues goal from bulky striker, Victor Nyirenda, put Malawi ahead- and ostensibly earning him scorer of the fastest goal at the on-going Cecafa tournament in Tanzania.

Malawi held on to that slender lead, but leading has never been winning. Kinnah learned this bitter lesson for the umpteenth time when Uganda equalized six minutes before regulation time.

And the Ugandans deserved it; having been denied a clear goal 20 minutes into the first half, when their captain took advantage of a defensive lapse to over-jump Malawi's Number One Goalie Amidu Ali.

So far, the Flames' defense has been porous; and Kinnah seems to have no way out in his pockets- call it tactic- to fill up that pot hole.

He has stopped behaving as the tactician reporters 'lotion' on to his innocent being..

When have all the tactics gone? Has Kinnah rode on the back of Mother Luck all this time, making Malawians believe they had a Dr. Kamuzu Banda of the pitch?

To make matters worse, Leader of the Malawi Delegation Julius Mithi told Super Sport 6 that Kinnah told the 'boys' to score just one goal in the first half (and relax).

"It was our tactic to score a single goal in the first half. Actually, we want to take the trophy- I understand it will be a replica trophy (since Malawi and Zambia have been invited as guest teams)- to Malawi and leave the rest to the others," said Mithi.

And Mithi was beaming, making a mockery of himself and the nation.

When Uganda equalised, Mithi hid his head in his over-sized hands- ashamed of himself, ashamed of the Flames' 'boys'.

To say the least, the Malawi National Football Team players have been a shame themselves- giving out balls carelessly, then opening their cracked defense.

This made Ali too busy on Thursday, as he saved Malawi from imminent defeat on several occasions.

But he made some 'useless' blunders in the first half, the most notable being the fumble he made in the 10th minute. He was lucky to go for recess with a clean sheet.

Otherwise, Ali was outstanding. At one time, he expertly took hold of a swerving free kick that was but heading into the net.

This notwithstanding, Kinnah's coaching credentials are being tested and, so far, he has failed to live up to the mark.

The players are partly to blame for this; they seem to be less-committed- looking at the way they marked in both the game against Kenya and Uganda.

It would only be proper to shout: Send Kinnah and the boys home!

Fourth gay marriage bid rejected in UK

Richard and David will now take legal action




Gay marriage ban violates Human Rights Act, they say



'Equal Love' campaign seeks gay marriages & straight civil partnerships



London, UK - 2 December 2010








Photo Credits: Chris Houston

A gay couple's application for a civil marriage licence was today refused by Greenwich register office in south-east London.




David Watters (40) and Richard Hull (49) were turned away on the grounds that UK law states that marriage partners have to be male and female.



Richard and David now plan to challenge this restriction in the courts, arguing that the ban on same-sex marriage violates the Human Rights Act - specifically Articles 14 (protection against discrimination), 12 (the right to marry) and 8 (the right to respect for family life).



Responding to the refusal of their request for a marriage licence, David Watters said:




"Being refused the licence didn't exactly come as a surprise. After all, the five other couples who have gone before us have been turned away. What does surprise me is that society still tolerates homophobic discrimination in marriage law.



"My emotions are mixed. There is a great sense of sadness and anger that my love for Richard is not accorded the same respect and rights as the love that heterosexuals share.



"It is overwhelming to be part of such an historic campaign. I have an immense feeling of hope and positivity about the eventual outcome. Richard and I are here for the long haul. The justice of our claim for marriage equality will win out sooner or later," he said.



His partner Richard Hull added:



"Like David, I am neither surprised nor shocked at the outcome today. But I am annoyed and upset that I cannot celebrate my love for David by going through a marriage ceremony; instead we are expected to settle for what I regard as second best, a civil partnership.



"Our love is no less than that shared by a heterosexual couple. Speaking as a gay man who once had a heterosexual marriage, I feel cheated. I was allowed to get married when I was engaged to a woman but I am denied this option when I want to marry David.



"I feel privileged to be joining the other couples on the Equal Love Campaign, knowing that we will eventually change the law, so that I can celebrate my love for David by marrying him. I don't want to settle for a civil partnership which, for us, is not an adequate option," he concluded.



David Watters is a personal development consultant, writer on equality issues and author of Never blend in: The legacy of Harvey Milk. Richard Hull is a catering manager and chef. They have been together in a relationship for six years.




The couple's bid is part of the new Equal Love campaign, which is seeking to overturn the twin prohibitions on gay civil marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships.



www.equallove.org.uk



The 'Equal Love' campaign is coordinated by human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell and sponsored by the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights organisation OutRage!, with the support of the Peter Tatchell Human Rights Fund.



"A similar ban on Asian or Jewish marriages would provoke fierce condemnation and mass protests. So why are so many people silent about the ban on gay marriages?" queried Equal Love coordinator Peter Tatchell, who attended the register office with Richard and David today.



"We see the Equal Love campaign as a historic quest for justice; morally equivalent to the campaigns to overturn the bans on inter-racial marriage in apartheid South Africa and the Deep South of the USA.



"Prohibiting same-sex civil marriages and opposite-sex civil partnerships is a form of sexual apartheid - one law for gay couples and another law for heterosexual partners. Two wrongs don't make a right.



"David and Richard are the sixth of eight couples to challenge these twin bans, and the fourth same-sex couple to do so.



"They are the second same-sex couple to file an application at Greenwich register office. The first same-sex couple, Rev Sharon Ferguson and her partner Franka, applied on 2 November and were also rejected.



"A total of eight couples will file applications at their local register offices. Four same-sex couples will apply for civil marriages and four heterosexual couples will apply for civil partnerships. One couple will make an application every week until 14 December.



"We expect that all eight couples will be turned away. They will then launch a joint legal action to end sexual orientation discrimination in civil marriage and civil partnership law," said Mr Tatchell.



The Equal Love campaign's legal advisor is Professor Robert Wintemute, Professor of Human Rights Law at Kings College London.



"By excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage, and different-sex couples from civil partnership, the UK Government is discriminating on the ground of sexual orientation, contrary to the Human Rights Act. The twin bans violate Article 14 (protection against discrimination), Article 12 (the right to marry) and Article 8 (the right to respect for family life)," said Professor Wintemute.



"The rights attached to civil marriage and civil partnership are identical, especially with regard to adoption of children, donor insemination, and surrogacy. There is no longer any justification for excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage and different-sex couples from civil partnership. It's like having separate drinking fountains or beaches for different racial groups, even though the water is the same. The only function of the twin bans is to mark lesbian and gay people as inferior to heterosexual people," he said.



Explaining their bid for marriage equality, David Watters said:



"The current ban on gay marriage denies us the dignity and respect that is conveyed through the institution of marriage.



"Equality under the law is a fundamental human right. Prohibiting same-sex marriage excludes gay people from enjoying the same legal status as heterosexuals. This amounts to unfair treatment for gay couples like ourselves. We want to embrace the commitment and responsibilities that come with marriage. The law won't allow us to do so.



"Negative social perceptions are perpetuated through exclusion from public institutions like marriage. Society will not progress until both heterosexual and homosexual relationships are enshrined in law with the same validity and rights.

"Marriage inequality creates two classes of citizens: inferior and superior. Marriage equality, alongside other equality initiatives, will contribute to an enriched, enlightened and fairer society.



"Civil Partnerships are often not accepted socially as being on a par with civil or religious marriages. This perpetuates a continued 'us and them' attitude; reinforcing, rather than challenging, the inferiority of gay relationships.



"Since the legal rights and responsibilities of civil partnerships are almost identical to those of civil marriage, why have two separate systems?" David queried.



His partner Richard Hull added:



"If we live in a country where we are supposed to have equal rights regardless of our sexuality, why is it necessary for the gay community to be relegated to a separate institution, civil partnerships?



"We should have the same access to civil marriage as heterosexual couples. The ban on gay marriage should be overturned because, until it is, we are still not truly equal citizens.



"Civil partnerships are a recent invention, which create a divide between homosexual and heterosexual couples. They are a legal form of segregation, much like apartheid but based upon sexual orientation rather than race.



"This denial of marriage rights doesn't reflect our personal aspirations but instead devalues us.



"It is a fundamental human right to marry the person of one's choice. I would like to exercise my right to marry David. I don't want to be his civil partner.



"The truth is that desire, domesticity, intimacy and love make no gender distinction. My desire to marry David is equal in depth and validity to the desires of any heterosexual person," he said.



Commenting further on the Equal Love campaign, Peter Tatchell noted:



"Our legal team will argue in the courts that the bans on gay marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships are unlawful and unjustified discrimination.



"In a democracy, gay and straight couples should be equal before the law. Both civil marriages and civil partnerships should be open to everyone without discrimination," he said.



"Our aim is to secure equality in civil marriage and civil partnership law. We want both systems open to all couples, gay and straight, so that everyone has a free and equal choice.



"Same-sex marriage is the growing trend all over the world. It exists in Canada, Argentina and South Africa, as well as seven of our European neighbours: Portugal, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Iceland. We want marriage equality in Britain too.



"Political support for ending the ban on gay marriage is growing. London Mayor, Boris Johnson, and former Conservative Party Vice-Chair, Margot James MP, have both come out in favour of allowing lesbian and gay couples to marry in a registry office, on the same terms as heterosexual partners.



"This view is also endorsed by the leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband, and by the deputy prime minister Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats.



"Both the Liberal Democrat and the Green party conferences have voted overwhelmingly in favour of ending the bans on gay civil marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships," noted Mr Tatchell.



Public attitudes have shifted strongly in favour of allowing gay couples to marry. A Populus opinion poll in June 2009 found that 61% of the public believe that: "Gay couples should have an equal right to get married, not just to have civil partnerships." Only 33% disagreed.

Lesbian couple humiliated in Hampshire






Photo Credits: Brett Lock

Register office staff unhelpful & obstructive




Legal action now planned by Katie & Colette



Gay marriage ban violates Human Rights Act



'Equal Love' campaign seeks gay marriages & straight civil partnerships





A lesbian couple's application for a civil marriage licence was today rejected by Petersfield register office in Hampshire, southern England.



The register office staff - Lesley Romano and Gaynor Russell - refused to put their rejection in writing and were described by the lesbian couple as "officious, unhelpful, obstructive and dismissive."



Colette French (21) and her partner Katie Green (21) applied for a civil marriage, in a direct challenge to the ban on same-sex marriages.



They were turned away on the grounds that UK law does not allow same-sex couples to marry.

Responding to the refusal, a visibly upset Katie Green said:




"We expected to be refused but we were not expecting to be treated so unkindly. I felt humiliated and not respected. The staff didn't seem willing to listen or comprehend our case. They kept on interrupting us and offering us a civil partnership, which we kept telling them we didn't want. It was like being back in school and being lectured to. I found it a very unpleasant experience.



"The rejection of our application for a civil marriage was expected, but nonetheless still very disappointing. We've been denied our human right to have a civil marriage. Our rejection highlights the unjust and undemocratic nature of segregating gay and straight couples in separate institutions. In a democracy, public institutions should be open to all, without discrimination. As part of the Equal Love campaign, Colette and I now plan to use the courts to overturn the ban on same-sex civil marriage.



"Being able to get married means a lot to us. This rejection is just a momentary setback in the long struggle for marriage equality," she said.



An also distressed Colette French added:



"We were not treated with dignity and respect. The staff told us verbally that we could not be married because the law prohibits same-sex marriage. We asked them to put this in writing but they were unwilling to do so. They seemed needlessly unhelpful. They have referred us to the head registrar. We intend to pursue the matter. All the previous couples were given letters of rejection and were treated with great sympathy and courtesy. We are perplexed by the attitude of the register staff at Petersfield.



"We are sad that our desire for a civil marriage has been blocked. Rejecting us on the grounds of our sexuality is frustrating and discriminatory. I love Katie and want our love to be validated through a civil marriage. We will continue to fight this injustice through the courts, together with the seven other gay and straight couples who are part of the Equal Love campaign. We're confident that the ban on gay marriage will be eventually overturned. It is against the spirit and letter of the Human Rights Act. We are proud to part of this historic campaign for equal rights," she concluded.



Human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, who accompanied Colette and Katie to the register office, later spoke with the register office staff:



"I was shocked by their unnecessarily obstructive manner. They were not listening to Katie and Colette. I tried to reason with them but they were curt and dismissive. This is the first time in the Equal Love campaign that register office staff have been unhelpful. Both women left the register office very upset. They were upset not by the rejection of their application but by the way they were treated," he said.



Colette French is an administrator and Katie Green is a student at of International Relations and Politics at Portsmouth University. Both were born in Portsmouth. They have been together in a relationship for two years.



See more quotes from Colette and Katie towards the end of this news release.



The couple's bid is part of the new Equal Love campaign, which is seeking to overturn the twin prohibitions on gay civil marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships.



www.equallove.org.uk



The 'Equal Love' campaign is coordinated by human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell and sponsored by the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights organisation OutRage!, with the support of the Peter Tatchell Human Rights Fund.



"Katie and Colette are the fifth of eight couples to challenge these twin bans, and the third same-sex couple to do so" said Equal Love coordinator Peter Tatchell.



"In the coming weeks, a total of eight couples will file applications at their local register offices. Four same-sex couples will apply for civil marriages and four heterosexual couples will apply for civil partnerships. One couple will make an application every week until 14 December.



"We expect that all eight couples will be turned away. They will then launch a joint legal action to end sexual orientation discrimination in civil marriage and civil partnership law.



"We see the Equal Love campaign as a historic quest for justice; morally equivalent to the campaigns to overturn the bans on inter-racial marriage in apartheid South Africa and the Deep South of the USA.



"A similar ban on black marriages would provoke an outcry. So why should the ban on gay marriages be tolerated?



"The bans on same-sex civil marriages and opposite-sex civil partnerships are a form of sexual apartheid - one law for gay couples and another law for heterosexual partners. Two wrongs don't make a right," said Mr Tatchell.



The Equal Love campaign's legal advisor is Professor Robert Wintemute, Professor of Human Rights Law at Kings College London.



"By excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage, and different-sex couples from civil partnership, the UK Government is discriminating on the ground of sexual orientation, contrary to the Human Rights Act. The twin bans violate Article 14 (protection against discrimination), Article 12 (the right to marry) and Article 8 (the right to respect for family life)," said Professor Wintemute.



"The rights attached to civil marriage and civil partnership are identical, especially with regard to adoption of children, donor insemination, and surrogacy. There is no longer any justification for excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage and different-sex couples from civil partnership. It's like having separate drinking fountains or beaches for different racial groups, even though the water is the same. The only function of the twin bans is to mark lesbian and gay people as inferior to heterosexual people," he said.



Explaining their bid for marriage equality, Katie Green said:



"We love each other and want to formalise our relationship. Marriage is the universally recognised system of love and commitment. We want to be part of it, to secure the ultimate recognition of our relationship.



"In a democracy, institutions should reflect society and be open to all. Civil partnerships and civil marriages offer almost the same rights and responsibilities. Therefore it seems the only reason that marriage has a closed door policy towards lesbian and gay couples is to denote their inferior status.



"Segregating gay couples into civil partnerships perpetuates homophobic prejudice and discrimination," she said.



Her partner Colette French added:



"The ban on gay marriage denies us a democratic right. Not allowing us to register our commitment to each other as a marriage reinforces and promotes inequality.



"Love is equal and should be recognised as such. Failure to open up marriage to all couples sends out the message that lesbian and gay couples are not on par with our heterosexual counterparts.



"I have a lasting commitment to Katie and wish to register this through a civil marriage. I feel that civil partnerships were set up as a second class institution to deny us equality with opposite-sex couples," she said.



Commenting further on the Equal Love campaign, Peter Tatchell noted:



"Our legal team will argue in the courts that the bans on gay marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships are unlawful and unjustified discrimination.



"In a democracy, gay and straight couples should be equal before the law. Both civil marriages and civil partnerships should be open to everyone without discrimination," he said.



"Our aim is to secure equality in civil marriage and civil partnership law. We want both systems open to all couples, gay and straight, so that everyone has a free and equal choice.



"Same-sex marriage is the growing trend all over the world. It exists in Canada, Argentina and South Africa, as well as seven of our European neighbours: Portugal, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Iceland. We want marriage equality in Britain too.



"Political support for ending the ban on gay marriage is growing. London Mayor, Boris Johnson, and former Conservative Party Vice-Chair, Margot James MP, have both come out in favour of allowing lesbian and gay couples to marry in a registry office, on the same terms as heterosexual partners.



"This view is also endorsed by the leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband, and by the deputy prime minister Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats.



"Both the Liberal Democrat and the Green party conferences have voted overwhelmingly in favour of ending the bans on gay civil marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships," noted Mr Tatchell.



Public attitudes have shifted strongly in favour of allowing gay couples to marry. A Populus opinion poll in June 2009 found that 61% of the public believe that: "Gay couples should have an equal right to get married, not just to have civil partnerships." Only 33% disagreed.

Bicycle ambulances on high demand

Bicycle ambulances, touted for reducing maternal and morbidity death rates, are on highdemand in Malawi.


The Calista Mutharika Foundation for Safe Motherhood is the latest charity organisation to appreciate the role of such ambulances. The First Lady-owned charity purchased 25 bicycle ambulances from Sakaramenta.

The handover ceremony took place on World AIDS Day, a decision Mutharika described as tactical.

After all, she said, the death of women due to birth complications was as serious as HIV and AIDS, and deserved equal attention.

http://www.myblogger.co.za closes down

http://www.myblogger.co.za/, a consolidated blog of Southern African bloggers, is no more.
This has come as a surprise to many of the bloggers who run weblogs for the same, in part because all their information is gone, and partly because there was no official notice to the effect that the site will die.
Where once net-lovers found up-to-date information and alerts about various activities taking place in Africa, now twinkles a message:

MyBlogger.co.za has closed down permanently. We are apologise for the inconvenience.

Just like that.

Rest in peace http://www.myblogger.co.za/.

Getting Fiqhed

A common complaint against Islam is that the "good" Muslims don't condemn the Muslims who are terrorists.




Lately, an old declaration by a fiqh council has been popping up. [A fiqh council is made of Islamic jurists who are experts in Sharia law and it applications.] Dozens of imams and Islamic groups condemn terrorism by signing a fatwa [judgment]. It sounds great, but how does it look under closer examination? Take this sentence:



"Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of violence against innocent lives."



What could be possibly wrong with this strict condemnation? The possible splinter in the banister is what specific words mean. Take "extremism" for example. The average Kafir (non-believer) thinks of terror. Terror is extreme, by definition, but what we are actually talking about is religious extremism, in particular, Islam. What is extreme Islam? Surely Islamic terrorism is extreme Islam.



Before we can examine "extreme Islam", we must define Islam. Islam is the political/religious doctrine found the Koran and the Sunna (Mohammed's perfect life-example.) The Sunna is found in the Sira (Mohammed's biography) and the Hadith (the Traditions, small Mohammed stories). The Koran, the Sira and the Hadith compose the Trilogy. The Trilogy defines Islam. If it is in the Trilogy, it is Islam. If it is in the Trilogy it is normal Islam.



What is the content of the Trilogy? Murder, plots against the enemies of Islam, assassinations, mass executions, sneak attacks, torture, Jew-hatred, theft, kidnappings, open warfare, and more. Since they are in the Trilogy, these actions are normal, not extreme. September 11 attack on the World Trade Center was not extremism.



So far as terror goes, terror is as Islamic as a call-to-prayer.



Koran 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!"



Bukhari 1,7,331 Mohammed:

I have been given five things, which were not given to any one else before me:

1. Allah made me victorious by awe, by His frightening my enemies for a distance of one month's journey.



The fiqh council's fatwa includes a quote from the Koran:



Koran 5:32 whoever killed a human being, unjustly, shall be regarded as having killed all mankind.



The problem is that this quote from the Islamic scholars is taqiyya (sacred deception). Look at what they left out:



Koran 5:32 That was why We laid it down for the Jews that whoever killed a human being, unjustly, shall be regarded as having killed all mankind



That advice was for the Jews--the Jews, not the Muslims. Let's examine the next two verses that advise the Muslims:



Koran 5:33 Those that make war against Allah and His apostle and spread disorder in the land shall be slain or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the land. They shall be held up to shame in this world and sternly punished in the hereafter: except those that repent before you reduce them. For you must know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.



Koran 5:35 Believers, have fear of Allah and seek the right path to Him. Fight valiantly for His cause, so that you may triumph.



When Muslims kill a Kafir, it is regarded as a sacred act, jihad.



Now look at the word, "innocent". Mohammed sent out his jihadists on seven raids before they were successful on their eighth attempt to destroy the Kafirs' caravan. It is significant that they used deception to accomplish this task. The jihadists disguised themselves as "religious" pilgrims to approach the caravan drivers. They murdered one, captured those who did not escape and stole their merchandise.



What was the guilt of the caravan drivers? They were Meccan Kafirs. That was their only guilt. We might say that they were innocent, but they were part of a group that denied the fact that Mohammed was the prophet of the only god, Allah. That is guilt enough to be murdered. No one who denies that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah is innocent.



If you know the doctrine of Islam, the entire fatwa condemning terrorism is pure deception. Why be surprised? Mohammed repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive if it would advance the Islamic cause, and the fiqh council follows the Sunna of Mohammed to the letter.



The reason that this deception works is the average Kafir politician, reporter, pastor, priest or rabbi is deliberately and willfully ignorant. It is not that Islam is so skillful; but that Kafir leaders are such ignorant, politically correct cowards who refuse to educate themselves to the detriment of their own religious faith and their own country.

Case 4: Abrogation and Dualism in Islam

Not only are there two Korans, Meccan and Medinan, that are different in tone and subject matter, but also the Koran has many verses that contradict each other.




Koran 2:219 says that Muslims should be tolerant and forgiving to People of the Book.

Koran 9:29 says to attack the People of the Book until they pay the jizyah, the dhimmi tax, submit to Sharia law and be humbled.



Which verse shows the true nature of Islam?



The Koran recognizes its contradictions and even gives a rule to resolve the contradictions. The later verse abrogates (supercedes) the earlier verse. This does not mean, however, that the earlier verse is wrong or in error. This would be impossible since the fundamental hypothesis is that Allah created the Koran and, hence, the earlier verse must be true or Allah would be wrong.



Abrogation has an impact on the arguments about the true nature of Islam. At endless interfaith dialogs, the early tolerant verse is quoted to show the nature of Islam as being peaceful. When both verses are quoted and then abrogation is applied, we see that the later verse trumps the earlier tolerant one. Jihad abrogates tolerance. In general, the Medinan Koran abrogates the Meccan Koran. In the two verses above, tolerance is abrogated by jihad against the Christians.



But, the earlier verse is true and still used. Abrogation does not negate the early verse. Indeed, the earlier "peaceful" verse that is abrogated is the one most apt to be used in public discourse.



This creates a logical problem, since if two things contradict each other, at least one of them must be false. This is a fundamental element of Western unitary logic. In Koranic logic, two statements can contradict each other and both are true. This is dualistic logic.



An alternative explanation is that the early verse is first stage in a process, like a seed, and the later verse is a second stage, like a plant. There is truth to this, but the process model does not take into account the fact that both truths are available at the same time. To go back to the analogy, you don't have the seed and the plant at the same time. The verses contradict each other and are both true at the same time. This is dualistic logic.



The contradictions are usually explained by abrogation, the classical doctrine, but the principle of abrogation is limited to the Koran. Duality includes the special case of abrogation and it explains how the entire doctrine of Koran and Sunna work. It is not just the Koran that is contradictory, but all of the Sunna.



Another dualistic aspect of Islam is its ethics. One of the chief features of Islam is the doctrine of the Kafir. It treats them dreadfully and horribly. No one would ever want to be treated as a Kafir is treated in the Trilogy. This leads us to the Golden Rule. There is no Golden Rule in Islam because of the division of humanity into believer and Kafir. The Golden Rule is to treat ALL people as you would be treated. Since no one wants be treated like a Kafir, and the Kafir is so central to Islamic doctrine, it proves that Islam has no Golden Rule. Islam has one set of rules for Muslims and another set of rules for Kafirs. This is dualistic ethics. An example of the dual ethics is the subject of friends. The Koran has 13 verses that say that a Muslim is not to be a friend of Kafirs.

On child slavery and exploitation

The numbers around child slavery and exploitation are simply staggering, and there aren't enough people fighting back.




More than 150 million children younger than 14 years-old are child laborers -- one in six children in the world. Those children do hazardous work in mines or on farms, often handling chemicals and pesticides or working near dangerous machinery. Others toil as domestic servants in homes or workshops.



Another 300,000 children under 18 are child soldiers used as combatants, messengers, porters, cooks, or sexual servants in some 30 conflicts worldwide. They are most often forcibly recruited or abducted, or feel so helpless and overwhelmed by poverty they are driven to join the fight.



Girls are particularly vulnerable. Some as young as 13 are trafficked as "mail-order brides." Nearly 90% of domestic workers trafficked in West and Central Africa are girls.

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Bingu's Government Turning Draconian

The Administration of President Bingu wa Mutharika is turning more draconian and dictatorial, recent developments show.


Since his rise to power in 2004, on the ticket of the once-mighty and now-tattered United Democratic Front (UDF), and his subsequent dumping of the same to form his own Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Mutharika has shown tendencies that tend to drift away from the norm.

This point was buttressed, several times, by the then UDF Publicity Secretary Sam Mpasu. Mpasu, an orator and creative writer of sorts, wondered how it could be possible for form a political party while already in government.

“I thought people form political parties in order to go into government? You do not go into government in order to form a political party,” said Mpasu.

What he forgot was that here was an individual out to break norms, and move away from the expected. To a larger extent, this has chalked out positive results for Malawi, food security and economic stability being the notable ones.

Mutharika has also set about changing people’s mindsets: taking away the normalcy associated with poverty among a large chunk of the population, and bringing away a philosophy of the non-existence of poverty on the ground- it is all in the mind, people’s minds.

“Malawi is not poor; it is Malawians themselves who are poor,” Mutharika has never tired to repeat, repeat and repeat.

Opposition politicians such as Malawi Congress Party’s (MCP) President, John Tembo, have capitalized on this (Bingu’s sentiment) to gain political mileage. At an MCP meeting held on March 25, 2010 at Demonstration Primary School Ground in Dedza South (Constituency), Tembo portlayed Mutharika as someone who is out of touch with the reality on the ground.

He said: “Some people, and, unfortunately, these are leaders we have chosen to rule over us, say that Malawi is not poor. Is this true? He asked the gathered multitude.

To which the people responded: “No!”

It was a resounding no; a no that reverberated across the horizon.

What, again, what Mutharika is saying could be true. In the sense that it is people (Malawians) themselves ( a majority of them) who lack the basic necessities. However, Malawi itself- the landscape where we find mountains, valleys, fertilizer alluvial soils, uranium, niobium, phosphate, among others; and the waters such as Lake Malawi, Shire River, Linthipe, Chia lagoon, among the many, are full of resources.

These resources, if well-utilised, can help wash away the poverty mentality in the people. It is al about putting things to good use, learning to manage our time and resources, and believing that Malawi can move out of poverty.

Mutharika thus trashes United Nations Development Indices that continue to indicate that over half the population of Malawi lives below the One-Dollar-a-Day poverty threshold. This is pure economic thinking, the economic engineer he is.

Economists argue that UNDP Development indices, and in deed other findings that put monetary figures to poverty, get it all wrong. They say the ordinary villager, for instance, may not have an equivalent of One Dollar a day in the pocket- but they have vegetables and fruits in their gardens and fields.

When they pick a fruit, that could be worth K200 in mega stores, the UNDP and others are never there to observe, and record. This misses out in the findings, and gives people a wrong picture.

Nevertheless, Mutharika has also shown negative tendencies- tendencies that can best be described as counter-productive, draconian and ill- conceived.

Talk about the Mutharika’s threat during the Opening of the National Agriculture Fair in Blantyre earlier this year. The State President threatened to close down any newspaper that publishes ‘lies’ and falsehoods, and challenged donors to the floor.

In his argument, the Head of State and Government- who is also the reigning African Union Chairperson- said even in “Europe and the United Kingdom- they don’t tolerate newspapers out to discredit the government” and wondered why closing a newspaper or publication could be an issue simply because it has been carried out by a Third world government that depends heavily (at least 60 per cent) on donors to propel its national budget.

Then, we also have the proposed bill that seeks to vest in the Information Minister powers, powers to close down publications he or she deems not fit for the Malawian public. This the Minister will do at the mere opening or closing of his mouth, and the subsequent cheating called Gazetting.

It will not matter whether the minister has a big, or small mouth; is married, or a bachelor or spinster; has a farm or a mere garden; was appointed on merit, or is part of the political appeasement deal; looks at the people when delivering a speech, or speeches and salivates on the paper (speech) from which he speaks- in which case he or she doesn’t speak his mind, but the paper’s mind!

Add to this the arrest of religious leaders for merely speaking out; the continued intimidation and undermining of the Vice-President Joyce Banda; the negative attitude Mutharika and his ruling party cohorts have developed against the Catholic Church, simply because the Episcopal Conference of Malawi chose to call fibs by their name, and smash Mr. Spade to a dry stump of a mahogany tree by simply grabbing the tail.

Then, there is the recent government action- through Lands Minister, John Bande’s order- to posses a piece of land belonging to Friends of Mulanje Orphans (FOMO). FOMO was established by philanthropist Mary Woodworth, after noticing that many orphaned children had nothing to do, mainly, and saw tea estates as the only way out of poverty. Woodworth believes that it is the class room’s door that holds the key to the future, and does just that to the children she feeds from the piece of land government wants to grab.

Actually, Banda has acknowledged that the piece of land belongs to Woodworth, but maintains that government will go ahead to take “that piece of land” because it caused confusion.

This followed bad blood between Woodworth and Mulli Brothers, when the later claimed the piece of land belonged to it.

Woodworth then hired lawyer John Gift Mwakhwawa, the current Malawi Law Society President, and won the case in the Supreme Court of Appeal. The court ruled that the land belongs to Woodworth, and Woodworth was happy because the children would eat.

Now, even before that excitement is over, government comes with the ‘evil’ plan to grab the land from the British citizen.

You should have been there when the court made the decision: people from all walks of life in Mulanje were happy. The court was all noise and a garden of excitement.

The truth is that the Mulli Brothers are DPP zealots, and government wants to please them by grabbing land from Mulanje orphans; people who are helpless. Government is abusing its big, filthy, stinking hand to take away something precious from innocent children, and well-wishing woman just because a company lost a piece of land, and which company has links with ruling party zealots.

Some of them have held Ministerial positions and continue to do so- whether as junior minister or senior, it is still Minister because the name is there for all to see.

This (grabbing of land and formulation of draconian rules) is the mark of an evil government- a government out to rob, maim, kill, grab and beat innocent citizens of this country.

It is the mark of a government run by selfish people and dictators disguised as Good Samaritans.

It is a government that does not care for its citizens, save it be the leaders own pockets and pampered egos.

Woodworth summarized it all when she lamented: “If government wants to grab that piece of land, it shows that it does not respect its own laws. If the government can not respect its own laws, how can ordinary citizens respect those laws?”

In other words, Woodworth is saying the Malawi Government has no moral sense.

Now, a government without morals is no government; it is a Commercial Sex Worker!

And that is what has become of this government.

It has become an ill-intentioned government, out to torture its own citizens.

And this is unacceptable.

Those entrusted with public position, whose mandate they get from the ordinary villager’s trek to the polling station, to cast that living vote, should know that Malawi does not belong to them alone. Malawi belongs to all of us.

When some of them left the country on self or otherwise-imposed exile, Malawi did not stop to be. The ordinary villagers were there for Malawi, digging through its soil, and watering it with their own bodily sweat. The fed the soil the salt of their own bodies; and fed it artificial fertilizers too.

And Malawi was green.

When the M’chikumbe Nambala Wani (Farmer Number One) Dr. Hastings Kamuzu Banda left for the way of all the earth in late 1997- a man whose contributions to Malawi will never be diluted in present freedoms, and whose legacy will leave on- Malawi wept, but never stopped to exist on the world map.

Same with former President Bakili Muluzi. When he left Sanjika for BCA Hill in Blantyre (a trek from Blantyre to Blantyre) government business continued. It is not leaders who make Malawi what it is; it is the spirit and psyche of the Malawian people that pushed the vessel that is Malawi.

And DPP leaders seem to have forgotten this, and have set about, wrong-footed, to torture, confuse, maim, threaten innocent citizens.

All this hurts Malawi, that reach in resources land and water scape, and the Malawian- whose abundant lot remains stuck in the mud of poverty.

Surely, to quote Shakespeare, ‘The evil that men do lives after them’.

Only that, you have no powers and authority to perpetuate the evils you are doing now. It is high time our leaders came back to their senses: Malawi will continue to live long after they are gone, and (Malawi shall) live again when all of us take the lonely road to Kumsitu, Kumasamba (the grave yard). For those who cremate themselves, it is still downwards (thanks to Gravitational Force) their ash heads to; never heavenward.

It is the spirits that do. Naked spirits.

And the spirits (for those who believe that people ‘pass on’, or live on after death- others do not believe in after death, and these are the guys and guyesses who believe that people ‘pass away’- wear no Diplomatic tags!

The spirits take no draconian tendencies with them, when they go; only memories of the days gone by, and a land and water scape remotely down.

All are equals.

And this is a principle we should adopt, and get well-used to- that nobody is more important than the rest.

The ordinary villager, actually, is as important to Malawi as the President.

And the President and Malawi Government have no right and business violating the laws of this land; let alone formulate draconian laws.

No.