Contesting electoral outcome in court: Chilima
The Constitutional
Court case on elections is no ordinary case; it could be a route to democratic
maturity.
Malawians purchased
their liberty on a peaceful note in June 1993, when a national referendum
showed that citizens were tired of the status quo— one party regime— and wanted
change; the change being another turn of multiparty politics.
It must be borne in
mind that Malawi started off, immediately after changing its name from
Nyasaland to Malawi, on a multiparty politics note, with more than two
political parties competing in national elections that culminated in the
election of the Malawi Congress Party (MCP).
Then, one turn led to
another and another and, when the biggest turn of them all was made, one party
regime. The other parties sort of ruled
themselves out of relevance.
And so began Malawians’
romance with one political song, the song that ended in 1994 when, after
tilting towards democracy, Malawians voted in the United Democratic Front (UDF).
And, every now and
then, especially when Malawians vote in national elections, the experiment that
is multiparty politics faces a litmus test— again and again, like an exponential
curve.
In 1999, when the UDF
won the presidential elections without partnering other political parties,
Alliance for Democracy (Aford) and MCP cried foul that the polls were “rigged”.
United Party, formed by former president the late Bingu wa Mutharika, lost but its
torch-bearer had no qualms.
Apparently, Malawians
abandoned the ‘one party’ for the ‘they have rigged the elections’ song.
In 2004, when UDF won
again, this time after featuring the pair of Bingu and Cassim Chilumpha— who
was, this year, banned from contesting for the presidency on Tikonze Alliance
ticket, apparently because, according to Malawi Electoral Commission (Mec), he
did not have the mandate to do so— the MCP cried foul.
It was joined by
Mgwirizano Coalition, represented in the presidential election by veteran politician
Gwanda Chakuamba. There were protests in Blantyre City and, sadly, the life of
a girl, Epiphania Bonjesi from Chilobwe, was lost after she was shot dead by a
police officer whose identity will never be established.
The song ‘they have
rigged the election’ was not sang in the 2009 elections, when Bingu, who had
pulled a fast one on UDF by resigning from the party on Anti-Corruption Day,
February 5, in 2005 and forming his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), won the
presidential election overwhelmingly.
Mutharika won with 66.1
percent of the votes cast, the first presidential candidate to do so. In 2004,
Bingu won with 35.9 percent votes.
In 2014, incumbent
president Peter Mutharika won with 36 percent of the votes and 38 percent in
the May 21 2019 presidential election.
Of these elections, it
is only the 1994 and 2009 presidential elections that did not attract calls of ‘rigging’,
that song synonymous with Malawi’s nascent democracy.
Otherwise, the MCP
cried foul in 2014 and this year, when the party has been joined in the chorus
by UTM of former vice president Saulos Chilima.
They lament the use of
Tipp-ex, which Mec Chairperson Justice Jane Ansah said surprised the electoral
body, as “Tipp-ex is not part of the elections’ package”.
This prompted losing
political parties to, using separate ways, seek recourse in the courts.
Justice Charles
Mkandawire asked the political parties to consolidate their cases, culminating
in Chief Justice Andrew Nyirenda appointing five judges to president over the
case at the Constitutional Court.
The case is in court
and presents the greatest test to the Judiciary.
On Wednesday, the
judges will decide on whether the opposition UTM and MCP filed applications to
the court procedurally, as argued by DPP’s lawyers, while the opposition
parties will pray that their voice be heard.
Meanwhile, people
continue to protest across the country, sometimes attracting the ire of police.
Two weeks ago, police
teargassed MCP headquarters in Lilongwe, including outgoing United States
Ambassador to Malawi Virginia Palmer, who was bidding bye to MCP leader Lazarus
Chakwera at the party’s head offices.
Whether police have
silently apologised to the American government is not known.
As the case rages, it
is clear that there have been bigger and smaller casualties. The bigger casualties,
in terms of losing an election, are the MCP and UTM while the smaller parties
are UDF and Alliance for Democracy (Aford), which have seen the numbers of
their legislators dwindle.
In the 1994 parliamentary election, Aford scooped
all seats in the Northern Region and some in the Central Region.
However, Aford’s numbers in Parliament started to
dwindle after the then party leader, the late Chakufwa Chihana, entered into an
alliance with the then governing UDF. Currently, Aford has one MP in
Parliament.
UDF came to power in 1994 after defeating Malawi
Congress Party in 1994. It swept seats in the Southern Region and most seats in
the Central Region.
During the 1999 elections, UDF won 91 seats but
the figures continued to drop in subsequent elections when it won 49 seats in
2004 and 16 in 2009, 14 in 2014 and 10 in the 2019 polls.
There Malawi’s greatest
losers.
Who knows? Maybe the
Judiciary may become the next loser, even when Malawians continue to treat it
as a potentate in the land of the lake— Malawi.
No comments:
Post a Comment